Build LogSEO
#11
2026-07-286 min read

Four fixes to pass AdSense: Google scores the estate, not the page

The UK Calculators readiness audit scored 7 of 8 green before submission. Eight days later, AdSense rejected the site on content quality. Closing the gap to re-submission required four separate fixes — telemetry, thin surfaces, media diversity, and hub listings — because Google scores the estate as a portfolio, not page by page.

Read post
Build LogSEO
#12
2026-07-255 min read

AdSense low-value rejection: thin pages, empty hubs, and six SVG diagrams

UK Calculators was rejected for low-value content on 10 July — ads.txt was authorised, so this was purely a content-quality judgement. Three concrete moves addressed the specific inventory-value criteria: expanding thin calculator landings, adding SVG diagrams across the pillar estate, and populating empty hub pages the rejection identified.

Read post
AdSenseSEO
#13
2026-07-235 min read

AdSense readiness: the checklist caught one gap, the reviewer found another, the sweep found a third

Seven out of eight on the automated readiness audit, then rejected for low value content anyway. The fix required three rounds: media diversity closed before submission, hollow hub listings after rejection, and a site-wide sweep that stripped fabricated trust signals the structural checklist had no way to catch.

Read post
Build LogAdSense
#14
2026-07-235 min read

Google's AdSense reviewer checklist returned 7 of 8 green. Format diversity was the one that counted.

Running Google's reviewer checklist against UK Calculators returned 7 of 8 green. The one red item was format diversity: zero of 38 articles had any embedded visual content. Eight days after submission, rejected for low value content — a checklist score doesn't carry item weights, and format diversity was the one Google's reviewer weighted most.

Read post
AdSenseSEO
#15
2026-07-185 min read

AdSense said 'low value content'. Mapping that to actual pages took a day.

The ads.txt was authorised. The rejection still came back 'low value content' on 10 July — a content quality judgement that maps to three specific gaps: thin surfaces, empty hub listings, and zero images across 38 articles. Passing the re-review required treating Google's inventory-value policy as a content brief, not a configuration checklist.

Read post