Posts on Learning Hub.
12 posts tagged "Learning Hub".
The navigation plan shipped on Pagefind. Prerequisite chips were the higher-leverage fix.
Six phases of navigation work shipped on the learning hub in July. Pagefind — site-wide search — closed the programme. Prerequisite chips, one phase earlier, delivered more navigability per line of code by firing at orientation time rather than recovery time.
The navigation spec pre-ranked prerequisite chips over search. Six phases later, that held.
The conventions.md backlog called prerequisite chips at the chapter head the single highest-value navigability fix before any code shipped. Pagefind search and an IntersectionObserver right-rail TOC both landed in the same programme. The ranking held. This is why.
Prerequisite chips, scroll-spy TOC, and Pagefind: the trio that closed the learning hub nav spec
Seven phases of navigation work landed on the learning hub over two days. Phases P0 through P4 were infrastructure. P5 and P6 changed what the property felt like to use — and both were in the spec from day one.
The highest-leverage navigation fix was a conditional on a frontmatter field
conventions.md ranked the N1 prerequisite chip as the single highest-value navigability fix before any phase of the learning-hub navigation plan shipped. After a scroll-spy TOC, hub track sections, and site-wide Pagefind search, the ranking holds. Reader-orientation at the chapter entry-point outperforms retrieval mechanics for an audience that doesn't know what it doesn't know.
Three words and an arrow: the learning spec's highest-value navigability fix
Seven phases of navigation work shipped across the learning hub. The spec rated P5 — a row of prerequisite chips at the chapter head — highest-value for navigability. It was the only phase designed to answer a question the reader didn’t know they had.