Build LogLearning Hub
#01
2026-07-245 min read

The search index built in three seconds. Five phases made that possible.

Pagefind took an afternoon to wire up. The navigation phases before it took a week. A search index returns what’s there — and what needed to be there first was structure.

Read post→
Build LogLearning
#02
2026-07-225 min read

The cheapest phase in a seven-phase plan was also the highest-leverage one

Prerequisite chips in the learning hub — three words, one arrow, no JavaScript — outperformed every other navigation phase by the only metric that matters at the chapter level: whether a reader knows what to read first. The evidence is what the other six phases cost by comparison.

Read post→
Build LogNavigation
#03
2026-07-175 min read

Seven navigation phases. The prerequisite chips encoded the one thing the others couldn't.

The learning navigation spec ran seven phases from foundational structure to site-wide search. P5 — prerequisite chips, a static 'Read first' link at each chapter head — was the smallest implementation. It was also the highest return: every other phase encoded page structure, and P5 encoded reader intent.

Read post→
Build LogLearning Hub
#04
2026-07-165 min read

Pagefind shipped last. The prerequisite chips had already closed the harder problem.

The learning hub's navigation plan ran seven phases and ended with site-wide Pagefind search. The highest-leverage phase was five: a three-word chip at each chapter head pointing to the one thing to read first. By the time search shipped, most readers who needed it no longer did.

Read post→
Build LogLearning Hub
#05
2026-07-165 min read

The navigation plan shipped on Pagefind. Prerequisite chips were the higher-leverage fix.

Six phases of navigation work shipped on the learning hub in July. Pagefind — site-wide search — closed the programme. Prerequisite chips, one phase earlier, delivered more navigability per line of code by firing at orientation time rather than recovery time.

Read post→