Posts on SEO.
41 posts tagged "SEO".
The ultracode review confirmed no technical blockers. The fix was six paragraphs of body prose.
PR #153's ultracode review of five legal pages and /stamp-duty-calculator returned HTTP 200, index/follow, and canonical self on every one. The GSC telemetry digest still listed all six as URL unknown to Google. The problem was not technical. Footer links do not transfer crawl weight the way body prose does.
Ultracode found nothing wrong with six stuck pages. The blocker was the footer.
PR #153 ran an ultracode review on five legal pages and /stamp-duty-calculator, all flagged as unknown to Google for consecutive weeks. Every technical check returned clean: HTTP 200, index follow, canonical self-referencing. The blocker was not in the code.
The third AdSense rejection forced the integrity sweep the site already needed
Three 'Low value content' verdicts in six weeks, ads.txt clean each time. The root cause wasn't a configuration gap — fabricated trust signals, undated stale rate articles, and thirty-eight pillar pages with zero images. AdSense named the problem accurately.
The calculator passed every technical check. Three AdSense rejections later, the hub pages were the problem.
Three identical 'Low value content' rejections, all with empty policyIssues fields and an authorised ads.txt. A 15-agent root-cause review pointed at the content estate, not the calculator logic. The fix was architectural, not compliance-oriented.
The fix for three AdSense rejections wasn't more calculators — it was honesty
A third 'low value content' rejection arrived on 1 August, days after a full remediation round had been submitted for review. A 15-agent root-cause analysis found what the July integrity sweep had already pointed at: fabricated trust signals, undated stale rate articles, and 38 pillar pages with zero visual content. The fix wasn't volume.